A very important movement. You might ask how to pay for all of the services offered now without the current method, but things will work out. Scholars want and need to share their research, and a way will be found under whatever new framework comes to exist.

arlpolicynotes:

Sign the petition today at wh.gov/6TH

(Source: vimeo.com)

“It’s just a matter o time until we see the same meltdown in traditional college education. Like the real estate industry, prices will rise until the market revolts. Then it will be too late. STudents will stop taking out the loans traditional Universities expect them to. And when they do tuition will come down. And when prices come down Universities will have to cut costs beyond what they are able to. They will have so many legacy costs, from tenured professors to construction projects to research they will be saddled with legacy costs and debt in much the same way the newspaper industry was. Which will all lead to a de-levering and a de-stabilization of the University system as we know it.”

Disruption in the Field Session notes

So I ran this nice session at THATCamp Museums New York 2012 on disruption theory. My aim was to tentatively introduce the idea and then explore the issues that arise for museums and libraries when dealing with disruption in the tech sphere, the obsolescence of purchased devices for example. My other goal was to see if and how practitioners were looking for or observing possible disruptive replacements for museums and libraries.

The session went great, and I got some interesting feedback on my presenting, as well as the topic. While others were talking, I took some notes of my own and I’ve decided to post them here. They are really, really raw, and others took better notes than I did (I assume), so look elsewhere for those. Here’s the link the notes on dropbox.

I’ll just echo this thought as well.

johnkaufeld:

My thoughts exactly.

I’ll just echo this thought as well.

johnkaufeld:

My thoughts exactly.

(Source: cartrunkent)

Yeah… Nope.

skidder:

AdWeek requires you to share certain stories in order to finish reading them. Why would I want to share something I can’t read? And is there anything more desperate a publisher can do? Gross.
Update: This is allegedly bug, Google tells Nieman Lab. But I’m not sure how the headline “To continue reading this page please share it” being entered into the code somewhere would be a bug. Alas, let’s hope it goes away.

Yeah… Nope.

skidder:

AdWeek requires you to share certain stories in order to finish reading them. Why would I want to share something I can’t read? And is there anything more desperate a publisher can do? Gross.

Update: This is allegedly bug, Google tells Nieman Lab. But I’m not sure how the headline “To continue reading this page please share it” being entered into the code somewhere would be a bug. Alas, let’s hope it goes away.